Young music fans today may consider the notion of the celebrity duet as a modern phenomenon unique to our times. It is not. Fact is, the notion of the cross-pollinating artist duet has been around for some time. Turn back the pages of music history, and you’ll find the concept started long ago. There are many fine and interesting pairings in soul and rock & roll throughout the 20th century — more than I could possibly list here — but let us not forget how Gram Parsons and Emmylou Harris made instinctive waves together for a brief spell in the 1970s, while Tom Petty paired up with Fleetwood Mac’s Stevie Nicks to great popularity in the 1980s, as did Peter Gabriel and Kate Bush, and you’ll also find hit 1990s duet albums from the likes of Elton John and Frank Sinatra. Much more recently, Lady Gaga and Tony Bennett have together put forth a few fine genre-mashup duet albums themselves. (See? I could go on and on.)

As for jazz, you’ll find many a dynamic duo hooking up on record. One of these legendary musical meet-ups began in the 1940s, when a young Ella Fitzgerald was connected with the already iconic Louis Armstrong, who was then at a career middle ground himself. One of the major influences on jazz overall — as well as what became known as scat vocal stylings, which Fitzgerald later helped to further popularize — the combination of Satchmo and Ella proved irresistible to the public. However, it took a number of years until they could release a full album together.

In 1956, jazz impresario Norman Granz formed a new label called Verve Records as a fresh vehicle for promoting his rising star, Ella Fitzgerald (whom he was by then managing). So strong was his belief in her, Granz’s determined vision indeed elevated her to megastar status. One of the first projects on that journey was reconnecting her with Louis Armstrong for a full album (in mono) which was called simply Ella And Louis (Verve MGV 4003). This release proved so successful that there was a sequel, October 1957’s Ella And Louis Again. The duo scaled an artistic peak with their brilliant April 1959 interpretation of George and Ira Gershwin’s legendary 1930s opera, Porgy and Bess.

UMe, owners and caretakers of the Verve Records catalog, have again paired up with the good folks at Acoustic Sounds to deliver us a fine 1LP restoration of Ella And Louis, which lists for $38.98. As with all the Acoustic Sounds releases I’ve reviewed here on AP thus far, this new production is exemplary overall. The pressing is top-notch, manufactured on thick, dark black 180g vinyl that is quiet and well-centered.

Overall, Ella’s warm, melted-buttery voice makes for a tasty contrast when poured over Pops’ more angular salty popcorn-crunch vocals. Add in Satch’s rich round trumpet playing, and you’ve got the formula for a sweet sonic taste sensation.

The sound on this new pressing is a wee bit on the bright side as compared to my 1950s-era copy of Ella And Louis, but I do think it sounds pretty terrific as an end-to-end listen. It must have been a particular challenge mixing and mastering this album — both back in the day, as well as today — given these were two very different vocalists recording simultaneously side-by-side in the same room. Each brought distinct dynamic qualities unique to their voices. Plus, they were recording in the then-new Capitol Records studios in Hollywood, which may have brought its own unique idiosyncrasies.

There could be any number of reasons for this brighter sound, and my first guess is it might be due to a limited amount of compression and EQ used in making the new release. The result is a more open and airy-sounding disc than the somewhat boxier sound of my original copy.

I do note there is an occasional bit of sibilance distortion apparent. I noticed it mainly on Louis’ vocals at times, such as on “Under a Blanket of Blue” and “Tenderly.” But I can’t fault this release, as I went back and listened closely to my original and it is there as well, albeit a bit reined in (likely by more EQ or compression).

So, one must come into this listening experience knowing that it is one of those “it is what it is” type situations. Pops’ vocals sound like they were recorded pretty hot, and in a quest to create a dynamic and intimate recording perhaps he was at times a bit too close to the microphone. Or, if the engineer perhaps “rode” the microphone input levels too high into to the red, the original recording might have oversaturated a bit. Again, I don’t know this for certain, of course, as I am just speculating here. Whatever it is, I am surmising the sound is part of the recording.

(Sidenote: For those who are curious, no, I don’t own a copy of the 2011 Analog Productions 45rpm edition to compare this to, but I did spot-check the 24-bit/96kHz streaming versions on Tidal and Qobuz — and indeed, Armstrong’s husky delivery is quite sibilant at times there, while Ella’s croon remains soft and feathery.)

The backing music provided by Oscar Peterson and his band of that period — Herb Ellis on guitar, Ray Brown on bass, and Buddy Rich on drums — is swinging, subtle, and supportive of the singers on this release. The music is full-bodied and rich, but definitely positioned in the background of the mix. If you close your eyes while listening to “Cheek to Cheek,” for example, it feels almost like the band is 5-10 feet behind the singers in the room.

If you are a deeper Ella And Louis fan, you may want to try to track down an original pressing, but I suspect you're going to have a difficult time of it. I say this from experience, as I've been trying to find a clean — and affordable — copy myself for many years now. This was a popular album in its day, and — like many jazz, pop, and R&B albums of the time period — they were often played on average to sub-average equipment. Indeed, if you look at the mid-1950s editions up for sale on Discogs at the time of this posting, none are listed in better than VG-plus quality, with prices ranging upwards of $100.

The cover art for this new Verve and Acoustic Sounds edition of Ella And Louis is dramatically improved. The original album was a single-pocket sleeve design, but the new version is a far more deluxe gatefold package with a beautiful, laminated finish and elegant-looking session photos inside. They even reproduced the early orange-and-yellow Verve Records label design that graced certain pressings from this time period.

I happen to know that particular label design mostly from some of Oscar Peterson’s easy-listening albums, but I think the original intent of the label variant was to try to establish a brand differentiation between jazz and pop-leaning releases. (My old copy of Ella And Louis is on the black Verve label, thanks for asking.)

Oh, you may be wondering why the album is in mono, and not in stereo. That's a very easy question to answer. Stereo records did not become a consumer reality until around 1958. That doesn't make this album any less of an enjoyable listening experience, however — because Ella And Louis generally sounds fabulous in mono!

Once again, UMe, through its Verve Records and Acoustic Sounds series, has delivered a reissue that is arguably better than the original in most every way. If you are a fan of these two legendary artists, you probably need this one in your collection ASAP.

(Mark Smotroff is an avid vinyl collector who has also worked in marketing communications for decades. He has reviewed music for AudiophileReview.com, among others, and you can see more of his impressive C.V. at LinkedIn.)

ELLA FITZGERALD AND LOUIS ARMSTRONG ELLA AND LOUIS 1LP 180g mono (Verve/Acoustic Sounds)

Side A 1. Can't We Be Friends 2. Isn't This A Lovely Day 3. Moonlight In Vermont 4. They Can't Take That Away From Me 5. Under A Blanket Of Blue 6. Tenderly

Side B 1. A Foggy Day 2. Stars Fell On Alabama 3. Cheek To Cheek 4. The Nearness Of You 5. April In Paris

Log in or register to post comments COMMENTS This may be analog anathema, but... Submitted by Anton D on Fri, 2022-08-19 13:09 The Esoteric SACD release of this album is spectacular. I figure if Mo Fi can release all that digital material, it should be OK to mention this Esoteric release. It is sublimely good. The bummer is, I think it only comes as part of this set: https://www.discogs.com/release/16504995-Various-Verve-6-Great-Jazz Log in or register to post comments It is part of that set. Submitted by volvic on Fri, 2022-08-19 14:06 I want it and keep trying to get it at a lower price, but no one seems to want to budge on the price and judging from the Miles Davis and Clifford Brown Esoteric SACD box sets that I already own, I expect it to be fabulous; Its funny your review posted today Mark, as I just heard my copy today, after the first one had to go back due to surface imperfections along with a Speakers Corner Miles Davis pressing which by the way, whatever happened to Speakers Corner quality control? Just awful these days. In any event, I thought the sound was smooth and both singers well captured. I don’t think it is as good as the 45 rpm version of a few years ago. Much better. Log in or register to post comments Holy Cow! Edit option needed Submitted by volvic on Fri, 2022-08-19 20:25 Analogplanet, an edit choice is sorely needed (see above). This is what happens when I type during happy hour. The horror! Log in or register to post comments The short version: Submitted by rich d on Fri, 2022-08-19 14:48 This album is an undiluted joy from start to finish and one of mankind's greatest achievements. If you care at all about music (I realize many audiophiles do not) you should own a copy of Ella and Louis. A very fine weekend to you all. Log in or register to post comments Comparison Submitted by jazz on Fri, 2022-08-19 17:30 The very slight sibilance on those tracks in my opinion is the typical Satchmo occasional mic sibilance, not from the record. Brightness I don’t hear at all on this release. I have the AP 45RPM and it’s a hell lot of better sounding, more open, 3D, focused etc. Log in or register to post comments Sound 8? Submitted by PeterPani on Sat, 2022-08-20 00:42 I own several early originals. This is an all valve all analog recording and the sound on them is a straight 11. Log in or register to post comments I think Submitted by jazz on Sat, 2022-08-20 02:22 Mark has some setup issues which overemphasize certain aspects. No idea what should sound bright here for example. But compared to the AP 45RPM I’d say the latter is an 11 and this here a 9 in my rough scale, so finally Mark is not completely wrong, given the potential upwards, he hasn’t heard yet. An 8 for this one is too low, I agree. Log in or register to post comments

The Esoteric SACD release of this album is spectacular.

I figure if Mo Fi can release all that digital material, it should be OK to mention this Esoteric release. It is sublimely good.

The bummer is, I think it only comes as part of this set:

https://www.discogs.com/release/16504995-Various-Verve-6-Great-Jazz

I want it and keep trying to get it at a lower price, but no one seems to want to budge on the price and judging from the Miles Davis and Clifford Brown Esoteric SACD box sets that I already own, I expect it to be fabulous; Its funny your review posted today Mark, as I just heard my copy today, after the first one had to go back due to surface imperfections along with a Speakers Corner Miles Davis pressing which by the way, whatever happened to Speakers Corner quality control? Just awful these days. In any event, I thought the sound was smooth and both singers well captured. I don’t think it is as good as the 45 rpm version of a few years ago. Much better.

Analogplanet, an edit choice is sorely needed (see above). This is what happens when I type during happy hour. The horror!

This album is an undiluted joy from start to finish and one of mankind's greatest achievements.

If you care at all about music (I realize many audiophiles do not) you should own a copy of Ella and Louis.

A very fine weekend to you all.

The very slight sibilance on those tracks in my opinion is the typical Satchmo occasional mic sibilance, not from the record.

Brightness I don’t hear at all on this release.

I have the AP 45RPM and it’s a hell lot of better sounding, more open, 3D, focused etc.

I own several early originals. This is an all valve all analog recording and the sound on them is a straight 11.

Mark has some setup issues which overemphasize certain aspects. No idea what should sound bright here for example.

But compared to the AP 45RPM I’d say the latter is an 11 and this here a 9 in my rough scale, so finally Mark is not completely wrong, given the potential upwards, he hasn’t heard yet.

An 8 for this one is too low, I agree.